Balance Quantitative and Qualitative Thinking in Sustainable Packaging

How to use both qualitative and quantitate analysis in deciding whether or not packaging is sustainable.

Balance Quantitative and Qualitative Thinking in Sustainable Packaging

In the world of sustainable packaging, it's easy to become so passionate about a particular environmental issue that we develop tunnel vision. I'm not criticizing anyone's passions - quite the opposite. I want us all to make the biggest positive impact possible, which requires a balanced perspective.

The Promise and Limits of Life Cycle Assessments

Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) have revolutionized sustainability by giving us numbers to work with. After years of vague terms like "green" and "eco-friendly," we finally have tools to quantify environmental impact.

This is powerful. Numbers allow us to compare options objectively. But we should be careful not to let quantitative analysis completely overshadow qualitative thinking.

The Paper vs. Plastic Bag Example

Consider a Clemson University study comparing paper and plastic retail bags. The LCA showed that paper bags actually have higher CO2 emissions than plastic bags. This might surprise many people who instinctively choose paper as the "greener" option.

If we only looked at carbon emissions, we might conclude that plastic bags are superior. But this single-metric view misses critical factors:

  • Plastic bags are rarely recycled through curbside programs
  • They're more harmful if they become ocean pollution
  • They persist in the environment for decades or longer
  • Paper bags break down naturally if they do enter the environment
  • Paper bags are widely accepted in curbside recycling

Would we really want to promote single-use plastic bags based solely on their carbon footprint? Most of us would say no.

Finding Balance

This doesn't mean LCAs aren't valuable - they absolutely are. Quantifying environmental impact is crucial for making informed decisions. But sustainability is multi-dimensional, and some impacts can't be fully captured in numbers.

The most robust approach combines:

  1. Quantitative analysis: Using LCAs and other metrics to measure impacts like carbon emissions, water usage, and energy consumption
  2. Qualitative considerations: Thinking holistically about factors like ocean pollution, circular economy potential, and real-world consumer behavior

When evaluating sustainable packaging options, start with a broad qualitative assessment of all relevant factors. Then use quantitative tools like LCAs to help make the final decision between options that are already qualitatively sound.

The Big Picture

Sustainability isn't just about optimizing a single metric. It's about creating systems that work harmoniously with our planet in multiple dimensions. Sometimes the option with a slightly higher carbon footprint might still be the better choice when all factors are considered.

Be passionate about sustainability, but remain open-minded and balanced in your approach. The planet deserves our most thoughtful, comprehensive analysis - not just the numbers that happen to be easiest to measure.

Michael Markarian

Explore More

Other articles that might interest you

News
What Does "Sustainable" Really Mean in Packaging?
What does the word "sustainable" even mean? Is it the right word we should all be using?
News
Choose Your Impact: How Sustainable Packaging Protects the Planet Your Way
I know a lot of you want to protect the planet, but you're not totally sure how packaging can actually help with that. This quick post can clarify that!
Get Started With A Free 30-Minute Sustainable Packaging Consultation!

Our sustainable packaging consultants are ready to educate you, answer your questions, and help you find the right sustainable packaging companies for your unique situation!

Book Your Free Consultation